Find Right Question
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Interpretations
Before executing, identify which interpretation matches the user’s input:
Interpretation 1 — Unstick yourself: You’re stuck on something and suspect you’re asking the wrong question — you need to find the question that actually unblocks progress (e.g., “I keep spinning on this” or “I’m stuck and don’t know why”). Interpretation 2 — Reframe a problem: Someone gave you a problem or you’ve been working on one, but it feels off — you want to find a better framing by discovering the right question underneath the surface-level one (e.g., “something about this problem statement feels wrong” or “am I even solving the right thing?”). Interpretation 3 — Start from confusion: You’re at the very beginning of something and don’t even know what to ask yet — you need to go from vague confusion to a specific, actionable question (e.g., “I don’t know where to start” or “I’m confused about this whole area”).
If ambiguous, ask: “I can help with finding the question that unblocks you, reframing a problem you suspect is misframed, or going from confusion to a clear starting question — which fits?” If clear from context, proceed with the matching interpretation.
Purpose
When you are stuck, starting something, failing, or just confused, the bottleneck is usually not the answer — it is the question. This procedure diagnoses your actual situation and generates the most actionable question to pursue.
Depth Scaling
Default: 2x. Parse depth from $ARGUMENTS if specified (e.g., “/frq 4x [claim]”).
| Depth | Min Candidates | Min Reframes | Min Validation | Min Depth Levels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1x | 3 | 1 | 3/5 | 2 |
| 2x | 5 | 2 | 3/5 | 3 |
| 4x | 8 | 4 | 4/5 | 4 |
| 8x | 12 | 6 | 4/5 | 5 |
| 16x | 18 | 10 | 5/5 | 6 |
These are floors. Go deeper where insight is dense. Compress where it’s not.
Step 0: Why do you need a question?
Answer this honestly:
| Your current situation | Go to |
|---|---|
| I’m stuck on something | SECTION A |
| I’m starting something new | SECTION B |
| Something isn’t working | SECTION C |
| I want to understand something | SECTION D |
| Someone asked me to solve a problem | SECTION E |
SECTION A: You’re Stuck
Step A1: Write Down What You’re Stuck On
Complete this sentence in writing:
“I am trying to _________ but I can’t because _________.”
You should see: A concrete statement with two parts — a goal and an obstacle.
If you can’t complete the sentence, your problem isn’t that you’re stuck. You don’t have a clear goal. Go to SECTION B.
Step A2: Check the Obstacle
Look at the “because” part of your sentence. Is the obstacle:
(a) A lack of information? (“I don’t know how to…”) Your question is: “Where can I find [specific info]?” This is an operational question. It’s probably the right one. Go find the information. DONE.
(b) A lack of options? (“I can’t think of a way to…”) Your question is: “What approaches exist that I haven’t considered?” Go to Step A3.
(c) A conflict between options? (“I can’t decide between…”) Your question is: “What criteria would make this decision obvious?” Go to Step A4.
(d) A feeling? (“I’m afraid to…” / “I don’t want to…” / “It feels wrong…”) Your question is NOT about the task. It’s about you. Go to Step A5.
(e) Something external? (“They won’t let me…” / “I don’t have the resources…”) Your question is: “Is this constraint real, or assumed? And if real, what changes?” Go to Step A6.
Step A3: Expand Your Option Space
List every approach you’ve already considered. Then for each one, ask:
- “What’s the OPPOSITE of this approach?”
- “What would a complete beginner try?”
- “What would someone with unlimited resources do?”
- “What would happen if I did nothing?”
Your question is the one that points at the most promising unexplored direction.
Test your question with SECTION F.
Step A4: Clarify Your Criteria
For each option you’re deciding between, write:
“If I choose this, I get _________ but lose _________.”
Now look at what you’d gain and lose. Ask:
“Which of these gains/losses matters most to me in [your time horizon — 1 month? 1 year? 5 years?]?”
Your question is: “What do I actually value more: [gain A] or [gain B]?”
Test your question with SECTION F.
Step A5: Address the Feeling
Name the feeling. Write it down. Then ask: “What is this feeling protecting me from?”
Common patterns:
- Fear: “What’s the worst realistic outcome, and can I handle it?”
- Overwhelm: “What is the ONE next thing I need to do?”
- Perfectionism: “What would ‘good enough’ look like?”
- Boredom: “What about this have I outgrown?”
- Resentment: “What did I agree to that I shouldn’t have?”
Your question is the one above that fits your feeling.
Test your question with SECTION F.
Step A6: Test the Constraint
Write down the constraint. Then answer:
“Has anyone ever done what I want despite this constraint?”
- Yes: Your question is: “How did they do it?”
- No: “Is there a different goal that avoids this constraint entirely?”
- Unsure: “What would I need to check to find out?”
Test your question with SECTION F.
SECTION B: You’re Starting Something New
Step B1: Define “Done”
Complete this sentence:
“This is successful when _________.”
If you can’t complete the sentence, your question is: “What would success look like, concretely?” Answer THAT question first, then return to B1.
Step B2: Find the Riskiest Assumption
List everything that must be true for your “done” definition to be achievable. These are your assumptions.
Rank them: Which is LEAST certain?
Your question is: “Is [least certain assumption] actually true? How would I find out quickly?”
Test your question with SECTION F.
SECTION C: Something Isn’t Working
Step C1: Specify the Failure
Complete this sentence:
“I expected _________ but instead I got _________.”
If you can’t specify what you expected, you didn’t have a clear goal. Go to SECTION B.
Step C2: Locate the Gap
The gap between expected and actual has a cause. List three possible causes, then for each ask: “What evidence would confirm or rule this out?”
Your question is: “Which of [cause 1 / cause 2 / cause 3] is actually responsible, and how can I test it fastest?”
If you can only think of one cause — WARNING: You’re probably anchored on the obvious explanation. Ask: “What if the obvious cause is wrong? What ELSE could produce this result?”
Test your question with SECTION F.
SECTION D: You Want to Understand Something
Step D1: Check Your Motive
Ask yourself honestly: “If I understood this, what would I DO differently?”
- Clear action: Your question is about HOW to do that action. Go to SECTION A, Step A2a.
- No clear action: Ask: “Is this curiosity or avoidance?” Be honest.
- Curiosity: Go to Step D2.
- Avoidance: You’re procrastinating. What are you avoiding? Go to SECTION A, Step A5.
Step D2: Find the Specific Confusion
Write down what you think you understand. Then mark the point where your understanding breaks down.
Your question lives at THAT boundary — the edge between what you know and what you don’t.
Frame it as: “I understand [X] but I don’t understand [Y]. What connects X to Y?”
Test your question with SECTION F.
SECTION E: Someone Gave You a Problem
Step E1: Check the Frame
Write down the problem as given to you. Then ask three questions about it:
-
“Is this the real problem, or a symptom?” To test: Ask “Why is this a problem?” If the answer points to a DIFFERENT problem, follow that chain until you hit a root.
-
“Whose problem is this really?” If it’s not yours, your question is: “What’s my actual role here?” (solver, advisor, supporter, affected party?)
-
“Has the problem-giver already decided the answer?” If yes, they don’t want a question — they want validation. Your question is: “Do I agree with their proposed solution?” If yes, help execute. If no, raise your concern.
Step E2: Reframe If Needed
If Step E1 revealed a different problem, write the NEW problem statement and go to the appropriate section (A through D).
If the problem survived E1 unchanged, it’s well-framed. Go to the appropriate section based on what type of problem it is.
SECTION F: Validate Your Question
Step F1: The Five Tests
Apply each test to your candidate question. Score: Pass (1) or Fail (0).
Test 1 — ACTIONABILITY: “If I got a clear answer to this question, would it change what I do?” Yes = Pass / No = Fail
Test 2 — SPECIFICITY: “Could two different people interpret this question differently and give different (valid) answers?” No = Pass / Yes = Fail (too vague, narrow it)
Test 3 — HONESTY: “Am I asking this to learn, or to confirm what I already believe?” To learn = Pass / To confirm = Fail (find what you’re avoiding)
Test 4 — LEVEL: “Is this question at the right level? Could there be a deeper question underneath it?” Right level = Pass / Deeper question exists = Fail (ask the deeper one)
Test 5 — ANSWERABILITY: “Is there a way — some observation, experiment, or analysis — that could answer this question?” Yes = Pass / No = Fail (reframe to be answerable)
Scoring:
- 5/5: You have your question. Go pursue the answer.
- 4/5: Fix the failing test and recheck.
- 3/5 or below: Go back to your section and dig deeper. You’re still on the surface.
Step F2: Final Formulation
Write your validated question in this format:
QUESTION: [your question] WHY THIS QUESTION: [1 sentence on why this is the right thing to ask right now] WHAT A GOOD ANSWER LOOKS LIKE: [what form the answer would take] FIRST STEP TO ANSWER IT: [one concrete action]
Quick Reference Cards
Card 1: Question-Level Ladder
- If you’re asking “How?” — check if you should ask “Should I?”
- If you’re asking “Should I?” — check if you should ask “What for?”
- If you’re asking “What for?” — check if you should ask “What matters?”
- Always go one level higher than feels natural.
Card 2: Red Flags That You Have the Wrong Question
- You already know the answer you want
- The question has been asked before and the answer didn’t help
- The question makes you feel smart rather than uncertain
- Everyone around you is asking the same question
- The question is about blame rather than mechanism
Card 3: Emergency Shortcut When completely lost, ask ONE of these:
- “What would I do if I couldn’t fail?”
- “What am I avoiding?”
- “What’s the simplest version of this?”
- “What would change my mind?”
- “What do I know for sure?”
Common Mistakes
- Starting with “How?” instead of “What?” or “Why?” — How-questions assume the goal is right. Check the goal first.
- Asking the question everyone else is asking — Consensus questions produce consensus answers. The right question is often the one nobody is asking.
- Refusing to ask simple questions — “What are we actually trying to do?” is the most powerful question in most situations, and the one people are most embarrassed to ask.
- Treating question-finding as a solo activity — Explaining your problem to someone else often reveals the question faster than thinking alone. The question emerges in the gap between your understanding and theirs.
- Asking questions in the wrong order — Foundational questions first, operational questions last. “Should I do this?” before “How should I do this?”
- Optimizing the question instead of testing it — A mediocre question that gets answered teaches you more than a perfect question that stays theoretical.
When to Override This Procedure
- Emergency / time pressure — Skip to the Emergency Shortcut (Card 3). Any question is better than no question when you need to act NOW.
- You already know the question but are stalling — Sometimes you know what to ask and you’re using “finding the right question” as procrastination. If a question came to mind immediately and makes you uncomfortable, that’s probably it.
- The situation is genuinely novel — No procedure can navigate a truly unprecedented situation. Use the procedure to get started, then trust your judgment as new information arrives.
- You’re in a collaborative context — Finding the right question WITH others is a different process (more dialogic, less procedural). Use this procedure for your own thinking, then bring your best question to the group.